• EI
  • Scopus
  • 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
连增维,龚小丽,陈月红,等. 基于GUM法和控制图法评定绿茶中三唑磷残留量测定的不确定度[J]. 华体会体育,2023,44(4):308−316. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022030374.
引用本文: 连增维,龚小丽,陈月红,等. 基于GUM法和控制图法评定绿茶中三唑磷残留量测定的不确定度[J]. 华体会体育,2023,44(4):308−316. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022030374.
LIAN Zengwei, GONG Xiaoli, CHEN Yuehong, et al. Uncertainty Evaluation of Triazophos Residues in Green Tea Based on GUM Method and Control Chart Method[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(4): 308−316. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022030374.
Citation: LIAN Zengwei, GONG Xiaoli, CHEN Yuehong, et al. Uncertainty Evaluation of Triazophos Residues in Green Tea Based on GUM Method and Control Chart Method[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(4): 308−316. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022030374.

基于GUM法和控制图法评定绿茶中三唑磷残留量测定的不确定度

Uncertainty Evaluation of Triazophos Residues in Green Tea Based on GUM Method and Control Chart Method

  • 摘要: 采用气相色谱-串联质谱法(GC-MS/MS)测定绿茶中三唑磷的残留量并进行不确定度评定。依据ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008(GUM法)和GB/T 27411-2012《检测实验室中常用不确定度评定方法与表示》(控制图法)对检测结果进行不确定度的分析与量化。结果表明,GUM法和控制图法的评定结果分别为(0.112±0.012)mg/kg,k=2和(0.108±0.018)mg/kg,k=2。GUM法的不确定度主要来源是质量浓度和仪器稳定性,其各自占总不确定度的38.9%和24.7%。控制图法只对检测结果进行统计分析,简单易操作,考察的是检测结果的长期趋势,可在日常检测工作中的内部质量控制应用中得到实施,而GUM法适用于复检样品或客户对不确定度有要求时的评定,计算复杂,但可在短时间内获得不确定度评定结果。

     

    Abstract: The amount of residual triazophos in green tea was determined by gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) and then the uncertainty was evaluated. According to ISO/IEC Guide 98-3: 2008 (GUM method) and GB/T 27411-2012 "Common uncertainty assessment methods and representations in testing laboratories" (control chart method), the uncertainty of the measurement results was analyzed and quantified. Results showed that, the evaluation results of the GUM method and the control chart method were (0.112±0.012) mg/kg, k=2 and (0.108±0.018) mg/kg, k=2, respectively. The main sources of uncertainty of the GUM method were mass concentration and instrument stability, which accounted for 38.9% and 24.7% of the total uncertainty respectively. The control chart method only performed statistical analysis of the test results, which was simple and easy to operate. It inspected the long-term trend of the test results and could be implemented in the application of internal quality control in daily testing work. The GUM method was suitable for re-examination of samples or the evaluation of uncertainty requirements by customers. The calculation was complex, but the uncertainty evaluation results could be obtained in the short term.

     

/

返回文章
返回