• EI
  • Scopus
  • 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
许宁,赵悦菡,侯召华. 非标记定量蛋白质组学研究干燥方式对牡丹花差异蛋白质的影响[J]. 华体会体育,2021,42(9):136−144. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020110094.
引用本文: 许宁,赵悦菡,侯召华. 非标记定量蛋白质组学研究干燥方式对牡丹花差异蛋白质的影响[J]. 华体会体育,2021,42(9):136−144. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020110094.
XU Ning, ZHAO Yuehan, HOU Zhaohua. Effect of Dry Methods on Differential Protein of Peony Peta Based on the Analysis of Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics [J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(9): 136−144. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020110094.
Citation: XU Ning, ZHAO Yuehan, HOU Zhaohua. Effect of Dry Methods on Differential Protein of Peony Peta Based on the Analysis of Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics [J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(9): 136−144. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2020110094.

非标记定量蛋白质组学研究干燥方式对牡丹花差异蛋白质的影响

Effect of Dry Methods on Differential Protein of Peony Peta Based on the Analysis of Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics

  • 摘要: 在蛋白质水平上,研究干燥方法(真空冷冻干燥、热风干燥、自然干燥)对牡丹花瓣的影响及作用机理。采用非标记定量蛋白质组学技术对牡丹花瓣进行蛋白质组学的差异性比较,并对差异蛋白质进行GO(Gene Ontology)、KEGG(Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes)注释富集分析,探讨加工方式对代谢通路的作用机制。结果表明:三组样品共定性1423个蛋白质,定量1349个,占总数94.80%;真空冷冻干燥样品FD、热风干燥样品HD、自然风干样品ZD定量蛋白质分别为1325、677、1085个,三组样品共同的定量蛋白质有656个。与HD比较,ZD显著差异蛋白质77个,上调24个,下调53个;77个显著差异蛋白质GO、KEGG分析表明,蛋白质主要集中在糖酵解/糖异生、丙酮酸代谢、TCA循环、内质网蛋白质加工通路。结论:加工方式对牡丹花蛋白质差异影响显著,该研究首次对采用蛋白质组学方法分析牡丹花差异蛋白的表达变化,为不同加工方法在实践中提供科学依据。

     

    Abstract: In order to explore the protein differences of different processing methods at the protein level on peony petal(hot air drying, HD; natural drying, ZD; vacuum freeze drying, FD), and provide theoretical basis for subsequent processing, the proteomic differences of three kinds of processed peony petal were compared by label-free proteomics. The results showed that: A total of 1423 proteins were identified and 1349 proteins (94.80%)were quantified in the three groups. 1325, 677, and 1085 proteins were quantified in FD, HD and ZD respectively. There were 656 proteins in the three groups. Compared with HD, 77 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were detected in ZD, up-regulated 24 proteins, down-regulated 53 proteins. 77 DEPs annotation using GO and KEGG database revealed that proteins were enriched in glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathway, pyruvate metabolism, TCA cycle, protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum. Conclusion: Processing methods had significant effect on protein difference of peony. This study is the first time to analyze the expression changes of differential proteins in peony flower by proteomics method, and provide scientific basis for different processing methods in practice.

     

/

返回文章
返回