• EI
  • Scopus
  • 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
孙英, 林舒琪, 杨秋玲, 陈瑞丹. 两种茶菊5个开花时期品质测定与评价[J]. 华体会体育, 2018, 39(8): 78-84. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.08.015
引用本文: 孙英, 林舒琪, 杨秋玲, 陈瑞丹. 两种茶菊5个开花时期品质测定与评价[J]. 华体会体育, 2018, 39(8): 78-84. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.08.015
SUN Ying, LIN Shu-qi, YANG Qiu-ling, CHEN Rui-dan. Quality measurement and evaluation of two varieties of tea Chrysanthemum of 5 flowering period[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2018, 39(8): 78-84. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.08.015
Citation: SUN Ying, LIN Shu-qi, YANG Qiu-ling, CHEN Rui-dan. Quality measurement and evaluation of two varieties of tea Chrysanthemum of 5 flowering period[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2018, 39(8): 78-84. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.08.015

两种茶菊5个开花时期品质测定与评价

Quality measurement and evaluation of two varieties of tea Chrysanthemum of 5 flowering period

  • 摘要: 以'玉人面’(YRM)和'冰甜玉人’(BTYR)两种茶菊为实验材料,分别测定其5个开花时期有机酸、可溶性糖、粗蛋白、粗纤维、粗脂肪、游离氨基酸、维生素C、总黄酮、茶多酚、绿原酸的含量,并以此10项指标进行综合评价。结果显示,10份茶菊样品品质指标存在差异;聚类分析结果显示,当聚为2类时,YRM5、BTYR5、YRM4、BTYR4聚为一类,YRM2、BTYR2、BTYR3、YRM3、BTYR1、YRM1聚为一类。当聚为4类时,BTYR4与BTYR1分别单独聚为一类,YRM4、YRM5和BTYR5聚为一类,其他茶菊样品聚为一类;当聚为6类时,YRM5、BTYR5、YRM4仍聚为一类,BTYR2、BTYR3、YRM3聚为一类,YRM2、BTYR4、BTYR1、YRM1分别单独聚为一类。进行主成分分析发现,BTYR4、BTYR5、BTYR2、YRM3、YRM5的综合评分较高;感官质量评审结果显示,YRM4、BTYR5、YRM5、YRM3、BTYR4评分较高。综合10份茶菊样品的主成分分析的综合得分与感官质量评价结果,评分结果均较高的是BTYR4、BTYR5、YRM3、YRM5,即'冰甜玉人’开花第4、5时期,以及'玉人面’开花第3、5时期。

     

    Abstract: Chrysanthemum ‘Yuren Mian’(YRM)and Chrysanthemum ‘BingTianYuRen’(BTYR)were the experimental materials and separately selected 5 flowering period to carry on the experiment. Organic acids,crude fat,crude protein,crude fiber,soluble sugar,free amino acids,vitamin C,flavonoids,polyphenols,chlorogenic acid were analyzed and evaluated. The results showed that the quality indexes of 10 samples of tea chrysanthemum were different. The cluster analysis results were as follows. When classified into 2 classes,YRM5,BTYR5,YRM4 and BTYR4 clustered into one group,and YRM2,BTYR2,BTYR3,YRM3,BTYR1and YRM1clustered into another group. When the cluster was 4,BTYR4 and BTYR1 were separately clustered into one class,YRM4,YRM5 and BTYR5 were clustered into one class,and other tea chrysanthemum samples were clustered into one class. When gathers was 6,YRM5,BTYR5,YRM4 still gathered into a group,BTYR2,BTYR3,YRM3 got together for a class,YRM2,BTYR4,BTYR1,YRM1 gathered separately for the category. Based on the principal components analysis discovery,BTYR4,BTYR5,BTYR2,YRM3 and YRM5 scored were higher. Sensory quality assessment results showed that YRM4,BTYR5,YRM5,YRM3 and BTYR4 scored were higher. Based on the comprehensive analysis of scores of principal component and the sensory quality evaluation results,higher scores were BTYR4,BTYR5,YRM3and YRM5.

     

/

返回文章
返回