• EI
  • Scopus
  • 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
廉明, 吕世懂, 吴远双, 周降生, 贺宜龙, 王晨, 孟庆雄. 三种不同发酵程度的台湾乌龙茶香气成分对比研究[J]. 华体会体育, 2015, (03): 297-302. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2015.03.054
引用本文: 廉明, 吕世懂, 吴远双, 周降生, 贺宜龙, 王晨, 孟庆雄. 三种不同发酵程度的台湾乌龙茶香气成分对比研究[J]. 华体会体育, 2015, (03): 297-302. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2015.03.054
LIAN Ming, LV Shi-dong, WU Yuan-shuang, ZHOU Jiang-sheng, HE Yi-long, WANG Chen, MENG Qing-xiong. Comparative analysis of aroma characteristics of three kinds of Taiwan oolong tea from different fermentation degree[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2015, (03): 297-302. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2015.03.054
Citation: LIAN Ming, LV Shi-dong, WU Yuan-shuang, ZHOU Jiang-sheng, HE Yi-long, WANG Chen, MENG Qing-xiong. Comparative analysis of aroma characteristics of three kinds of Taiwan oolong tea from different fermentation degree[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2015, (03): 297-302. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2015.03.054

三种不同发酵程度的台湾乌龙茶香气成分对比研究

Comparative analysis of aroma characteristics of three kinds of Taiwan oolong tea from different fermentation degree

  • 摘要: 采用顶空固相微萃取(headspace solid-phase microextraction,HS-SPME)结合气相色谱-质谱(gas chromatography-mass spectrometry,GC-MS)对3种不同发酵程度的台湾乌龙茶香气成分进行了研究,并比较了三种乌龙茶之间香气成分上的差异性。结果表明,在3种乌龙茶中共鉴定出香气成分72种,其中文山包种和冻顶乌龙茶香气成分较接近,但和东方美人茶之间差异较大;文山包种茶的香气成分主要是橙花叔醇、α-法呢烯、吲哚、茉莉内酯、顺-3-己烯醇苯甲酸酯、咖啡因、茉莉酮酸甲酯和β-紫罗酮等;冻顶乌龙茶的香气成分主要是α-法呢烯、橙花叔醇、吲哚、茉莉内酯、香叶醇、2,6,10,14-四甲基-十五烷、顺-3-己烯醇苯甲酸酯、咖啡因、β-紫罗酮、十六酸甲酯和香叶基丙酮等;而东方美人茶的香气成分主要是芳樟醇氧化物、橙花叔醇、十六酸、β-紫罗酮、芳樟醇、二氢猕猴桃内酯、咖啡因、香叶醇、己酸-3-己烯酯、香叶基丙酮、植酮和顺-3-己烯醇苯甲酸酯等。经对比发现,不同发酵程度的乌龙茶在香气成分上的相似和差异性可能与茶叶的加工工艺密切有关。 

     

    Abstract: The aroma components of three kinds of Taiwan oolong tea from different fermentation degree were extracted by fully automated headspace solid- phase microextraction( HS- SPME) and identified by gas chromatography- mass spectrometry( GC- MS). Comparison of the analytical results obtained was carried out on the composition and content of aroma compounds. Results showed that in total 72 aroma constituents were identified,among Pouchong tea and Dongding oolong tea had smaller difference,but there were many differences with oriental- beauty tea. The major aromatic components in Pouchong tea were nerolidol,α- farnesene,indole,jasmine lactone,cis- 3- hexenyl benzoate,caffeine,methyl jasmonate,and β- ionone; the major aromatic components in Dongding oolong tea were α- farnesene,nerolidol,indole,jasmine lactone,geraniol,2,6,10,14-tetramethyl- pentadecane,cis- 3- hexenyl benzoate,caffeine,β- ionone,methyl hexadecanoate and geranyl acetone; while the major aromatic components in Oriental- beauty tea were linalool oxides,nerolidol,hexadecylic acid,β- ionone,linalool,dihydroactinidiolide,caffeine,geraniol,hexanoic acid- 3- hexene ester,geranylacetone,phytone,cis- 3- hexenyl benzoate,etc. In comparison,the similarities and differences in aroma composition and content of three kinds of Taiwan oolong tea may be related to the different processing technologies and fermentation degree.

     

/

返回文章
返回