• EI
  • Scopus
  • 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
何聪聪, 苏柯冉, 苏杭, 刘野, 宋焕禄. SPME和P&T对西瓜汁香气成分萃取条件优化及二者的比较分析[J]. 华体会体育, 2014, (19): 194-198. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2014.19.033
引用本文: 何聪聪, 苏柯冉, 苏杭, 刘野, 宋焕禄. SPME和P&T对西瓜汁香气成分萃取条件优化及二者的比较分析[J]. 华体会体育, 2014, (19): 194-198. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2014.19.033
HE Cong-cong, SU Ke-ran, SU Hang, LIU Ye, SONG Huan-lu. Optimization and comparison of SPME and P&T in extraction effect on watermelon juice[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2014, (19): 194-198. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2014.19.033
Citation: HE Cong-cong, SU Ke-ran, SU Hang, LIU Ye, SONG Huan-lu. Optimization and comparison of SPME and P&T in extraction effect on watermelon juice[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2014, (19): 194-198. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2014.19.033

SPME和P&T对西瓜汁香气成分萃取条件优化及二者的比较分析

Optimization and comparison of SPME and P&T in extraction effect on watermelon juice

  • 摘要: 为了充分萃取西瓜汁的香气成分,避免萃取方法及条件对西瓜汁香气成分分析的影响,本研究优化了前处理方法中P&T的时间和温度、SPME中的萃取纤维、温度和时间,并将这两种方法的萃取效果进行了比对分析。研究表明,P&T的平衡温度50℃、吹扫时间30min能达到最佳的萃取效果;SPME优化的最佳萃取条件是:CAR/DVB/PDMS纤维、平衡温度40℃、平衡时间40min。这两种方法的对比研究表明,SPME对西瓜汁的萃取效果明显优于P&T。 

     

    Abstract: In order to identify aromatic compounds in watermelon juice and avoid the extraction methods and conditions on analysis impact in watermelon juice, the extraction time and temperature of P&T and the extraction fiber, temperature and time of SPME were optimized.At the same time, the two methods were compared on the effect of extraction.The results showed that extraction temperature 50℃ and time 30 min of P&T and extraction fiber CAR/DVB /PDMS, temperature 40℃, time 30 min of SPME could achieve the best effect of extraction.In addition, the extraction effect of SPME on watermelon juice was better than P&T.

     

/

返回文章
返回