• EI
  • Scopus
  • 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
黄艳斌, 李星琪, 张洵, 熊伟成, 陈厚荣. 鲜山药片干制过程中的无硫护色剂配方优化[J]. 华体会体育, 2014, (12): 324-329. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2014.12.063
引用本文: 黄艳斌, 李星琪, 张洵, 熊伟成, 陈厚荣. 鲜山药片干制过程中的无硫护色剂配方优化[J]. 华体会体育, 2014, (12): 324-329. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2014.12.063
HUANG Yan-bin, LI Xing-qi, ZHANG Xun, XIONG Wei-cheng, CHEN Hou-rong. Optimization of non-sulfur color-preservation formulation in the process of the fresh yam slices dried[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2014, (12): 324-329. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2014.12.063
Citation: HUANG Yan-bin, LI Xing-qi, ZHANG Xun, XIONG Wei-cheng, CHEN Hou-rong. Optimization of non-sulfur color-preservation formulation in the process of the fresh yam slices dried[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2014, (12): 324-329. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2014.12.063

鲜山药片干制过程中的无硫护色剂配方优化

Optimization of non-sulfur color-preservation formulation in the process of the fresh yam slices dried

  • 摘要: 研究了鲜山药片在干制过程中的无硫护色剂配方。以重庆新鲜怀山药为原料,在单因素实验的基础上,对所选护色剂进行筛选,得出适合山药干燥的护色剂种类和添加量,以色差值、L值为评价指标,通过正交实验优化了护色效果的护色剂配方。结果表明:柠檬酸、植酸、氯化钠的护色效果好,VC、EDTA效果不佳。响应面优化结果为1.99g/100mL氯化钠+0.84g/100mL柠檬酸+0.06g/100mL植酸复配效果最佳,色差值及L值的预测值分为17.1791、86.8254,验证值分别为17.8451、86.3742,与之接近,优化结果可靠。 

     

    Abstract: The formulation of non-sulfur color-preservation in the process of the fresh yam slices dried was studied. The sold fresh yam produced in Chongqing as raw materials, the color-preservation was selected that based on the single factor experiment, then the suitable color-preservation type and additive amount was got for the yam dried. The color difference value and L value as the evaluation index, the color-preservation formula was optimized through the orthogonal experiment. The effect of citric acid, phytic acid and NaCl was good, the effect of VC, EDTA was bad. The results of response surface optimization were as follows:1.99g/100mL NaCl+0.84g/100mL Citric acid+0.06g/100mL Phytic acid, the predicted value of the color difference value and L value was divided into 17.1791, 86.8254 and the verification value was 17.8451, 86.3742, the verification value was approaching to the predicted value, so the optimal results were reliable.

     

/

返回文章
返回