• EI
  • Scopus
  • 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
7种盐焗鸡翅产品品质特性研究[J]. 华体会体育, 2012, (22): 87-91. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2012.22.038
引用本文: 7种盐焗鸡翅产品品质特性研究[J]. 华体会体育, 2012, (22): 87-91. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2012.22.038
Study on quality properties of seven kinds of salt-baked chicken wings[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2012, (22): 87-91. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2012.22.038
Citation: Study on quality properties of seven kinds of salt-baked chicken wings[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2012, (22): 87-91. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2012.22.038

7种盐焗鸡翅产品品质特性研究

Study on quality properties of seven kinds of salt-baked chicken wings

  • 摘要: 为了研究市场上盐焗鸡翅的品质特性以及差异,对7种盐焗鸡翅的品质进行了仪器分析、感官评价、相关性分析、主成分分析。结果表明,7种盐焗鸡翅的剪切力、硬度大小依次为:产品7>6>1>5>2>4>3,感官得分较高的鸡翅分别为:产品1、5、2、7。相关性分析表明,感官总分与剪切力、硬度、咀嚼性、内聚性呈正相关;但是感官总分与撕裂力呈负相关,与弹性、刺破力、回复性、水分含量呈相关系数接近于零的负相关。主成分分析结果表明,12个仪器指标中可以提取3个主分量,累积方差贡献率达到87.902%,剪切力和硬度是反映鸡翅肉品质的主要因素。 

     

    Abstract: To compare the quality properties differences among the salt-baked chicken wings in the market, seven kinds of salt-baked chicken wings were selected to conduct instrumental analysis, sensory evaluation, correlation analysis and principal component analysis.The result indicated that seven kinds of salt-baked chicken wings ranked in the order of product 7, 6, 1, 5, 2, 4, 3 according to the shear force value and hardness.Product 1, 5, 2, 7 ranked in the top four according to the sensory score.The correlation analysis showed that, the sensory score had positive relation with shear force, hardness, chewiness and cohesiveness and negative relation with tear force and weak negative relation with springiness, puncture force, resilience and water content while the correlation coefficient was close to zero.Principal component analysis was performed based on 12 parameters of quality.Top 3 factors were selected and the cumulative contribution to variance was up to 87.902%, muscle shear force and hardness were the dominant factors.

     

/

返回文章
返回